I Need A Thesis Statement On Feminism

Click! The Ongoing Feminist Revolution

I need a thesis statement on feminism? | eNotes

But (1) is not the only way. (2), for instance, implies that although the speaker may accept the existance of feminism, s/he can deny its merits by denigrating its importance. What (2) actually means is something like "OK. There is such a movement but it can't be serious and therefore it should not be taken seriously". (2) also implies that there are only female feminists. This proposition is obviously wrong. Moreover, in (2) there is a typical element of condescending "permission" suggesting that it is men who allow women to take part in special activities the goals of which can only be amusement and never anything serious.

Theses on the Feminist Novel | Dissent Magazine

i need a good thesis statement on feminism? | Yahoo Answers

While of course we still have a long way to go regarding gender equality, there is a lot to celebrate regarding feminism in 2014. As someone who has grown up immersed in the feminist movement from a young age (my mother founded the women's website ), the reception of feminism has changed drastically from when I was a young girl. No longer am I immediately deemed as a bossy "man-hater" when I say I am a feminist and my peers are becoming increasingly aware of feminism's proper definition.

Theses on the Feminist Novel Roxane Gay ▪ Fall 2014 Alice Walker speaking in 2010 ..

Allen, friends said, was a talented photographer and electronic music promoter who wrote her honors thesis on radical feminism at Bridgewater State University and hosted an ‘80s music show on the college radio station.

Thesis Statement on Feminist theory. | Category: Sociology


Note, however, that not all agree with such an expansive definition of Feminism. One might agree that feminists ought to work to end all forms of oppression--oppression is unjust and feminists, like everyone else, have a moral obligation to fight injustice--without maintainingthat it is the mission of feminism to end all oppression. One might evenbelieve that in order to accomplish feminism's goals it is necessaryto combat racism and economic exploitation, but also think that thereis a narrower set of specifically feminist objectives. In other words,opposing oppression in its many forms may be instrumental to, even anecessary means to, feminism, but not intrinsic to it. E.g., bell hooksargues:Killjoy's final chapter is an edited version of an originally published in Guts Magazine, one that I found immensely powerful on first reading it there. Wunker brings the concept of feminist refusal into this new version, which I think dilutes somewhat from the original essay's focus on land, bodies, and the Idle No More movement. Nevertheless, the idea that certain kinds of refusal -- refusing to speak, to participate in the system, to perpetuate an unjust world -- can also be forms of action in themselves is compelling.

Feminism, as liberation struggle, must exist apart from and as a part of the larger struggle to eradicate domination in all itsforms. We must understand that patriarchal domination shares an ideological foundation with racism and other forms of group oppression, and that thereis no hope that it can be eradicated while these systems remain intact. This knowledge should consistently inform the direction of feminist theoryand practice. (hooks 1989, 22)
19th-century feminists reacted to cultural inequities including the pernicious, widespread acceptance of the image of women's "proper" role and "sphere." The Victorian ideal created a dichotomy of "separate spheres" for men and women that was very clearly defined in theory, though not always in reality. In this ideology, men were to occupy the public sphere (the space of wage labor and politics) and women the private sphere (the space of home and children). This "," also called "," was typified in Victorian such as and 's books. (1854) and , bestsellers by and Maria del Pilar Sinués de Marco, came to symbolize the Victorian feminine ideal. herself disparaged the concept of feminism, which she described in private letters as the "mad, wicked folly of 'Woman's Rights'